The Qy7’s are rated for five hours of listening time on a full charge and come with six different ear inserts/hooks for a custom fit. These headphones feature Bluetooth 4.1 connectivity, making them a perfect pair for Apple Watch. This is a savings of $10 off the original price, $6 below the regular listing, a match of our previous mention and the best current deal we can find. Individual coupon codes (see below) drop the final price down to $19.99 with free shipping for Prime members or for those with $35+ orders. SoundPEATS Audio via Amazon offers its Qy7 V4.1 Bluetooth Lightweight In-Ear Headphones in multiple colors for $25.99. Sign-up for our newsletters and have our best offers delivered to your inbox daily. Same product, bigger discount.This offer has expired!Be sure to follow us on Twitter for the latest deals and more.
This is an update of a story from September. While I can't agree the Truengine 3 SE earbuds are "better" than the Samsung Galaxy Buds Plus, I believe they're a steal at $28. The Soundpeats case is strictly USB-C.ĭoes any of that add up to a willingness to spend an extra $122? Definitely not. The Galaxy Buds can play longer on a charge, too - a whopping 11 hours, to the Soundpeats' 6.5 - and they come in a case that supports wireless charging. With the Soundpeats, I felt like they might fall out at any minute (though they never did, even after four miles). I'll also note that the Galaxy Buds stayed put in my ears a little better thanks to their little fin - but that was an issue only while running. There were a few times I forgot which pair I had in, however, and found myself impressed by the sound and thinking, "Oh, these must be the Buds" - and they were the Truengine. The sound quality seemed ever-so-slightly warmer. I don't have the highly tuned ears of, say, CNET's David Carnoy, but I will say I liked the Galaxy Buds just a little better overall. Starting with a Spotify playlist called Songs to Test Headphones With, I went back and forth with the two sets of earbuds.
Credit the dual dynamic drivers (same as Galaxy Buds have), Qualcomm 3020 chipset, aptX technology or some other techno-blab I won't pretend to understand.
Way better, in fact, than you'd expect for $37. Here's the upshot: The Soundpeats earbuds sound good. If you see a different one listed, the coupon and/or code might not be available. And before I dive into the outcome of my testing, a deal: For a limited time, Cheapskate readers can get the Soundpeats Truengine 3 SE wireless earbuds for $27.49 after clipping the on-page 20%-off coupon and then applying promo code QXD8NZCY at checkout. The Galaxy Buds Plus list for $150 the Soundpeats, for $50. That's some pretty bold confidence right there, especially considering the price disparity between these two. Read more: Samsung Galaxy Buds Plus reviewĬhallenge accepted. No problem, they said, we'll send you a pair to test for yourself. I responded that I didn't have Galaxy Buds and therefore couldn't do a direct comparison. It went down like this: The folks at Soundpeats invited me to try their new (at the time) Truengine 3 SE earbuds, noting that "some reviewers claim they're better than Samsung Galaxy Buds Plus." Usually the comparison is to AirPods, so I was intrigued. Not many are willing to put their money where their mouth is, so to speak. Lots and lots of companies ask me to write about their true wireless earbuds. The Soundpeats Truengine 3 SE sound way better than their Cheapskate-exclusive $28 price tag would suggest.